28
January

A Mystic Leader’s Crash Course: Darkness

Welcome back.

A Mystic Leader’s Crash Course: Part 1: Darkness

The church in the west acts as it does because it does not see the world as it is. How can 21st century leaders move people to enlist in the quest to save the universe? Let’s begin by lining up four images to help us describe the world.

What is required for the church to change?
The first of four images needed by 21st century leaders to describe the world we live in is Darkness. At a Harvard Business School address in 2002, Lou Gerstner of IBM stated:

” The transformation of an enterprise begins with a sense of crisis or urgency. No institution will go through fundamental changes unless it believes it is in deep trouble and needs to do something different to survive.” (source: Thomas Friedman, The World is Flat).

The church in the west acts as it does because it does not see clearly the darkness. Darkness is not about describing the present or any other moment in human history. Darkness is about pointing out human kind’s perpetual companion. Darkness is about the fact that human kind tends towards a darkness of ancient proportions. Even with the restraint of law or the release of grace, human kinds show a propensity towards great evil.

The church feels no urgency, no compulsion to change because it doesn’t care that the world is in deep trouble and needs to do something different to survive.


Ways in which culture helps us describe the darkness
During the second half of last century it was fashionable to talk about the secular future of the world. Many suspected that enlightened rationality would squeeze out the last vestiges of religion and superstition in the west, and eventually religion and faith would vanish from the face of the earth.

In the 20th century it was common to hear someone say, “more evil has been done in the name of religion than anything else.” Besides being false at face value, this way of seeing the world missed an obvious fact: the evil will impose their will in the name of anything and everything even religion if need be. Religion isn’t really the issue here. Evil is.

In describing the world, Christ following leaders must clearly described this fact: if religion were to disappear from the face of the earth, evil would remain because both the world and the human heart are dark places.

Without religion as the “fall guy” who and what would the secularist blame for the evil in the world? Republicans and the culture wars? Hollywood and the left wing?

Interstingly enough TV and film provide some help here. A few shows have tended to take a morally serious look at evil and the ethical dilemnas evil creates whether in a real historical sense (The Passion, The End of the Spear) or in a mythological sense (The Lord of the Rings, The Chronicles of Narnia) or in a dramatic action series (24).


Yes, we must call out the image of God that is part of man’s creation design. But we musn’t trivialize or reduce the malignant spirit of darkness embedded within the human heart and spread throughout human culture that eats away at the created order. The church will never rise to be that which she is called to be without clearly seeing how darkness has fallen upon the earth and devours her children.

Again, film helps here. Few things shake me to the core as the sight of children suffering. “Born Into Brothels” (2005) a documentary telling the story of the children of prostitutes in Calcutta and “Cidade de Deus” (aka City of God 2002) a Brazilian film based on the experiences of children growing up in an infamously violent housing project in Rio de Janeiro are two stories told on film that show us how too many children live.



How darkness may provide a clue to the meaning of everything
Ironically, Darkness may provide both those outside faith and those within faith the clearest view on absolute truth. Allow me to whisper to you something I have come to know and know deeply. I, and no one other than I, am responsible for my own evil. That is one thing I have come to Know. Let me whisper to you something else of which I have become convinced: If you will listen in on your own life, you’ll become convinced of the same thing about yourself.

The church will not rise with an appropriate primal scream unless she see’s the earth’s children all trapped in the dragon’s lair of evil, unable to breath until the gospel comes, and unless she experiences a gut wrenching deliverance from this power herself.

Personal note. From one mystic warrior to another: it’s a dangerous world but I know you are of the tribe that must enlist in the quest to save the universe. You are the ones who learn to feel your way forward in heroic attempts to reach those trapped in the dragon’s lair. Be careful. It’s dark out here.

What do you think?

into the mystic…

Alex McManus

65 comments

22
January

A Mystic Leader’s Crash Course: Introduction

Welcome back.

The role of a leader is to describe the world we live in and to show others how to live in that world with moral authenticity. As Christ following leaders begin to see the world through the life of Christ and begin to reorient their own lives, they find themselves increasingly compelled to join with others on a quest to save the universe.

I would like to suggest four images to 21st century leaders as a help in describing the world in which we live.

darkness
light
wind
clouds

I’ll unwrap these over the next few days.

Top Blog Post of the Day Walk to Starbucks with Rachel in Sheffield (UK)

Into the mystic…

Alex McManus

9 comments

19
January

TV in the bedroom halves your sex life

Thinking of buying a TV for the bedroom? Think again — it could ruin your sex life.

Reuters reports that “A study by an Italian sexologist has found that couples who have a TV set in their bedroom have sex half as often as those who don’t.” This article is everywhere. Here’s a link:TV in the bedroom

Maybe Italy is not as romantic a place as we thought.

Along these same lines, my post, Tivo, Sex and You, asks, “what happens to sex when we have 100 hours of tivo to get through by the end of the week?”

What do you think? Is television the ultimate birth control? Technology can bring us closer. Can it also make us more distant?

Top Post of the Day: Niza asks, “What does it take to leave eveything and go? A terrific post called “Great New Movie” regarding a life of following Christ in conversation with two terrific movies. Comments worth reading.

into the mystic…

Alex McManus.

17 comments

17
January

List for the Day

mystic church In search of the mystic. Can you find the sign?

Welcome back. You belong here.

Here’s a list…

erica.JPG Erica at work writing.

  • MUST SEE movie/documentary: Born Into Brothels -2005 rated R . If you appreciated Crash, you will be m o v e d by Born Into Brothels. It will help you remember why doing something to make the world a better place matters.

behindthemyst21.jpg in search between Brussels and London.

into the mystic…

Alex McManus

6 comments

16
January

The Future of Western Culture –Part 3: Diversity

Welcome Back.

Today:
Thoughts on Diversity
The Top Post of the Day
An Invitation to join me in Miami

The Future of Western Culture –Part 3: Diversity.
Mark Steyn suggests that, as a vanishing culture, western culture should ask the ever important question: “what do you leave behind?” This is a very important question because it assumes a belief that we have something of which we can be proud that should be preserved, a cultural gift to pass on to future humanity, if you will.

That’s the problem “diversity” presents to western culture.

Steyn gives the example of the Kadr family who betrayed their country (Canada) by killing Canadian, American and possibly Pakistani soldiers though their involvement with Al-Qaeda. The youngest son, being paralyzed in the shoot out with Pakistanis returned “home” to Canada and, along with his mother, demanded [vs. begged for] their rights to health care.

Here’s the amazing thing. According to Steyn, Canada’s prime minister took the boy’s claim on health care as “an excellent opportunity to demonstrate his own deep personal commitment to “Diversity.”

Steyn quotes the prime minister: “I believe that once you are a Canadian citizen, you have the right to your own views and to disagree.”

If Steyn represents this accurately, the prime minister is an example of a man who’s lost his way…and of a culture that’s lost confidence in itself, and the gifts it offers to the future. The problem with “diversity ” is that it is based on “tolerance”. Tolerance as it is practiced in the west can be defined as being so open minded that your brains fall out.

With all due respect to Al Gore, the health of the environment is not the greatest danger to humanity. Human evil is our greatest threat. Multiculturalism, diversity, and tolerance are words too often used to make us feel enlightened while leading us to act foolishly.

What do you think?

————————————

TOP POST OF THE DAY: Mark Hoelterhoff writing from Lithuania

Title: The Church’s New Address

Date of Post: January 14, 2006

Mark, Congratulations on an outstanding post. Everyone should read it for perspective.

———————————–

Join me in Miami. I’m teaching at a Regional Conference in Miami on February 7. For more info and to register click on “MIAMI –regional experience” in the “Pages” frame above to the right. If you or someone you know needs to reload meet me there. Let’s have dinner on South Beach.

Into the Mystic…

Alex McManus

8 comments

11
January

The Future of Western Culture -Part 2: Multiculturalism

Welcome back.

Canadian Mark Steyn writes in his article, It’s the Demography, Stupid:

The great thing about multiculturalism is that it doesn’t involve knowing anything about other cultures–the capital of Bhutan, the principal exports of Malawi, who cares? All it requires is feeling good about other cultures. It’s fundamentally a fraud, and I would argue was subliminally accepted on that basis. Most adherents to the idea that all cultures are equal don’t want to live in anything but an advanced Western society.

Are cultures equal or are they not? Can one culture be superior to another or not? The first step would be to ask, what criteria shall we use to compare cultures? Another question would be, Who shall establish what this critieria should be? Or, is it true that all things being relative these kinds of judgements are impossible to make?

What do you think?

I felt like making a list.

  • Funniest link in a Post of 2005: “stop alien abductions” on nizasings on December 17, 2005.

Into the Mystic…

Alex McManus

9 comments

10
January

The Future of Western Culture

Welcome back.

This Wednesday will bring two events of note. First, the NBC miliatry/action series called E RING is airing an episode written by a friend of mine. The title for this episode is “Breath of Allah”. I’ll be watching. Join me.

Speaking of Allah …and the future of western culture, check out this piece in opinionjournal.com called It’s the Demography, Stupid . Worth a read for those of you out there who share my interest in Islam and the future of western culture. Along with this article, if this topic interests you and you’re new to this blog, check out my previous posts on Eurabia , Global Demographics Part 1 and Global Demographics Part 2.

In keeping with the theme of the future of western culture, check out the article out of “usatoday.com” called Is God dead in Europe? Again, if you’re new, you may want to read along with this second article my post from Nov. 9th called Three in Four Americans Believe in Paranormal.

What do you think? Is it proper to conclude that in very broad strokes Western Culture is –oh, how shall we say it? — better, superior, improved over many other cultures and worth saving? Or is an Islamic future for Europe just as good/bad?

The second event of note for this Wednesday is that those of you who signed up to beta test our new blogging community, voxtropolis, will receive an invite to enter they beta environment. The “city of voices” thanks you for your help.

into the mystic…

Alex McManus

13 comments

23
November

A Future of Isolated Connectivity and Connected Isolation?

Welcome back.

In keeping with the theme of my last post (Nov 18), Unto us a Machine is Born, as well as my prior post (Oct 16), Is Blogging a Revolution? , here’s an article from the education page of Newsweek about the world of teenage Homo Electronicus Migratus called High Tech Hotspots . The italics in the quoted text below are my addition.

“The most wired students in the history of the world…are going off to college. Today’s entering freshmen created PowerPoint presentations in middle school, if not before—and yet may have never “dialed” a telephone. They grew up digital: with PCs, broadband and cell phones at the ready. Likelier to reach for Google than for a dictionary, they live-journal their days and photoblog their snaps, trade music and swim in a sea of messages—e-mail, instant messaging and text. Some of their parents may not even know what verbs like live-journal and IM mean. “Students are so tied in to computing and networking that it’s almost like an extension of their central nervous system,” says Garland Elmore, a professor of informatics and communications at Indiana University. “It’s how they connect to their friends, it’s how they connect to information—it’s how they connect to their world.”

Here’s my question: is this the most connected generation in history or the most disconnected?

George Will writes in an article titled Rudeness rewarded that we are “entertaining ourselves into inanition” –a state or quality of being empty. Because of our addiction to electronic connectedness, we are not present before others even in their presence, he suggests.

“With everyone chatting on cell phones when not floating in iPod-land, “this is an age of social autism, in which people just can’t see the value of imagining their impact on others.” We are entertaining ourselves into inanition. (There are Web sites for people with Internet addiction. Think about that.) And multiplying technologies of portable entertainments will enable “limitless self-absorption,” which will make people solipsistic, inconsiderate and antisocial. Hence manners are becoming unmannerly in this “age of lazy moral relativism combined with aggressive social insolence.”

I get what Will is talking about. I hate it when I’m talking to someone who then answers a call on his cell. I’m tempted to pull out my cell and call them on the spot. A paradox of life in the 21st century is that we live in an age of isolated connectivity or connected isloation. The person in front of us is less critical than the person beamed into our present reality via satellite.

The aim of “into the mystic…” is to make whatever world we travel more human. We take seriously and exploit the possiblities of the cyber world of relationships, but also take seriously the physicality of human kind. Yes, manners matter. Perhaps part of the etiquette of the 21st century is that all things being equal the f2f encounter is as important [or more] as the electronic one.

Thanks to Michael Martin of Australia and to Jaime Puente of Texas for the articles.

What do you think?

into the mystic…

Alex McManus

37 comments

18
November

Unto us the Machine is born

Welcome back.

I wish I could give thanks to the person who sent me this article, but I don’t remember who it was. Unto us the Machine is born, was originally published in Wired but appears now in an Australian newspaper. The essence of it is that the network (not the individual computer) is the computer and that this global network in it’s cumulative form is much like a brain. This “brain” learns and grows. Information travels throughout this global thinker from personal pc and laptop like signals travel through the synapses of the human brain. As almost all of us would attest, the net is an extension of our 21st century lives. What would signal the shift from the net being an extension of human life to humankind being an extension of the net?

Here’s a quote from the article:

“This planet-sized computer is comparable in complexity to a human brain. Both the brain and the web have hundreds of billions of neurons, or webpages. Each biological neuron sprouts synaptic links to thousands of other neurons, and each webpage branches into dozens of hyperlinks. That adds up to a trillion “synapses” between the static pages on the web. The human brain has about 100 times that number – but brains are not doubling in size every few years. The Machine is.”

What’s next?

  • Will the “thinker” become conscious?
  • If this were remotely possible, what would signal the shift from “global thinker” to “global mind”?
  • The following question has never been more relevant: What do you think?

into the mystic…

Alex McManus

17 comments

9
November

Three in Four Americans Believe in Paranormal

Welcome back.

I wrote a chapter in a book published by Relevant Books (The Relevant Church) where I suggested five realities awaiting us in our immediate future. One of those five realities is that “the future is spiritual.” How do I know this? Simple. The future is here.

A recent report from the Gallup Organization titled, Three in Four Americans Believe in Paranormal, suggests that “just about three in four Americans hold some paranormal belief — in at least one of the following: extra sensory perception (ESP), haunted houses, ghosts, mental telepathy, clairvoyance, astrology, communicating with the dead, witches, reincarnation, and channeling. There are no significant differences in belief by age, gender, education, or region of the country.”

Welcome to the future.

What do you think?

into the mystic…

Alex McManus

50 comments

« Previous Entries     Next Entries »