Is Mosaic a part of the Emerging Church?

Is Mosaic part of the Emerging Church?

I rarely pay any attention to rants against “into the Mystic…” The editorial early last spring by Brannon Howse was no exception. But, in light of the recent Calvary Chapel statement distancing themselves from the “emerging church”, I thought I would finally make a little comment about Brannon’s piece. I admit, Brannon’s piece made me chuckle and some of the comments made by some of Brannon’s posse have made me laugh out loud. In a weird sort of way, It was fun.

Brannon’s piece received an honorable mention here at “into the mystic” back then when it was written. You can read my full and complete response to Brannon’s piece at the bottom of my post dated March 9, 2006 and titled
ORIGINS – the MOSAIC leadership experience
.

However, rather than dismiss Brannon’s piece en toto, I felt I could use it as an instructive guide for us all. Brannon’s editorial was originally called “A Worldview Weekend Special Report: Bethel Seminary and University, The McManus Brothers, Mysticism and the Emerging Church.” To his credit, Brannon changed this misleading title by deleting “Bethel Seminary” and substituting “A Christian University” but he didn’t alter much of the misguided content of his opinion piece. This article doesn’t seem to be online anymore, but I have the PDF and may post it later.

I agree with some of what Brannon writes, but before I get to that, I need to clear up a couple of things. Brannon utterly fails when he seeks to equate Bethel University with the so called Emerging Church Movement. He totally misses the distinction between the “Emerging Church” and training “emerging” leaders.

Dictionary.com describes “emerging” like this:

e·merg·ing adj. Newly formed or just coming into prominence; emergent: emerging markets; the emerging states of Africa.

“Emerging” is a perfectly good word, a useful word. The term “emerging leaders” is a way of speaking about “new” or “young” or “future” leaders. Training emerging leaders is something all seminaries and universities have been trying to do for a long time. But, it is true, that we sometimes use this term today to capitalize on the “media” momentum that the word “emerging” has at present. So let’s give Brannon his due. He isn’t blind to everything with regard to the topic of his article. He sees this clearly. There’s definitely a media creation out there called for lack of a better term, “The Emerging Church.”

Those of you who know me know that I have for years explained that Mosaic is not an “emerging church” [or a “postmodern church” for that matter] in any sense of the word. Mosaic is an established mission with seasoned missional leadership and gobs of experience in effectively taking the gospel to some of the most challenging fields on the planet. No “emerging” happening at Mosaic except for the fact that we 1] have trained for decades now and continue to train younger, emerging leaders, 2] continue to learn and grow ourselves, 3] continue to innovate and break new ground in mission.

Recently a Los Angeles Times reporter was given the assignment to write an article on the “Emerging Church.” In doing her research she called me to talk about Mosaic. After she did her research and wrote the article, I spoke to her about why she chose not to include Mosaic. She had concluded from her research that Mosaic was not an emerging church because emerging churches tended to be “small, white and inward looking.” [Of course, this is not true of every church that self identifies as “emerging” and, what’s more, I see a future for small missional teams of whatever ethnicity, but we’ve got to lose the “inward looking” part]. Sometimes, the secular press gets it faster and deeper than the “Christian” news sources.

What’s more, Mosaic is different from the “Emerging Church” not just in terms of ambition, ethnicity, and mission, but also in attitude and thinking. Many of those who take on the mantle of the Emerging Church seem to me to be burned out Church leaders who needed to bail on a Christianity that offered pat but empty answers. I consider this a good move. But, in contrast, Mosaic is more like a convert who is full of enthusiasm, joy and hope. The new convert moves with speed and intentionality towards Jesus, towards the scriptures, towards Christ following community, and towards the world in service and mission.

Brannon doesn’t “feel” these distinctions. Yet.

So, Mosaic is not an emerging church. Brannon “misses the mark” by equating Bethel, Mosaic and Erwin with the “Emerging Church Movement.” It is true, however, to say that Bethel Seminary, Mosaic and Erwin are quickly becoming the reference points for “emerging” [i.e. “future,” “young,” “potential”] leaders. No doubt about it, they are hot, hot, hot and I highly recommend them all. [I hope it’s not too immodest to add here that “into the mystic…” has also become a quickly growing reference point for emerging leaders. Thanks to all of you for helping me spread the word.] I will continue to use the terms “emerging” and “emerging church” because truthfully I’m just not freaked out by what self-identified “emerging church” leaders are up to. In many ways, I “feel” them.

But I don’t want to be all negative. So let me finish this first installment on a positive note. Brannon also states in his editorial that the kinds of things I write about here at “into the mystic…” are “weird.” Here Brannon and I agree. This is weird. Brannon is not completely off after all. If we’re open, I guess, we can learn from anyone.

see you in the mystic…

Alex McManus
———————————–

Coming Up at “into the mystic….”:
The Emerging Church -Part 2
The Birthing of Human Machines

Advertisements

63 thoughts on “Is Mosaic a part of the Emerging Church?

  1. On my previous comment I should have added the last paragraph of Dan Kimball’s article which reads:

    “All of this word discussion is very silly and trivial.

    What all this word origin discussion means in the light of world problems, people suffering, wars etc. is so incredibly insignificant and even silly – but now I have answered what I get asked a lot and hope for those that care – this helps distinguish some of the differences of “emerging” and “emergent” as originally developed as we use them today.”

    If by ’emergent’ we mean emerging from the institutionalised religion that Christianity has become then fine, but why do we need to label it!?

    As long as we do what Jesus called us to do – our mission as his dsciples – we do not need a label. As Erwin so rightly points out if we ‘Live by Faith’, ‘Be known by Love’ and ‘Be a voice of Hope’, then we need no label, other than Followers of Jesus.

  2. Hello,

    With all do respect sir I have also read Brannon’s article and to me it is a very clear editorial about the direction churches like Mosaic, Kensington.. are leading those who attend them. That is whether you and Erwin Mc., are calling yourself Emerging or Emergent or not. First of all, I checked the mosaic website and it is at best very vague. Their is nothing written about the tenants of the Bible,Christianity and beliefs of your church. It is just a hodgepodge of “let’s get together”, for a mission. What mission is not clearly stated. Groups and meetings..community Yes it is good to get together as Christians but it is important to preach against sin..adultery,homosexuality,abortion, stealing, lying…and of course many others. Yet leaders like you and your brother are vague and don’t draw a clear line in what you are trying to accomplish. To some it is. Is it in numbers, number of people coming through the doors? The number of youth? Yes youth…come as you are..but change! Preach the tenants of the Gospel of Jesus Christ as they are written in the Bible and preach against sin! That’s what the people need to hear about, the good news of Salvation in Jesus Christ only. He only came to set the captives free! It’s not mystical. It’s The Truth.

  3. Alex and Erwin, God blessed me mightily by allowing me to pilgrimage with you all for a short time. I saw you Morhsr and Sister Lea a few weeks ago. Brought back many dear and interesting memories.
    I saw Rick Blythe recently and remembering the Rock House. Was just with Dee Deloy. Same old Dee. We were at Gerrie Leobard’s Memorial Service. Recall you two as active Soul Winners. Hope to hear from you all. That would be good. Haven’t seen you since E. LA. The Brazilian Restraunt. Been a while. Easy to track Erwin, Alex trying to catch up with what God is doing in your life these days.
    See you at the Finish Line
    Frank Bailey

    • Hey, Frank. Thanks for the kind note. Good times. Good to hear from you.
      You can track me through Twitter — @alex_mcmanus — through
      my newsletter which you can get through my website theimn.com
      and through my personal site — alexmcmanus.org .

      Trust you’re well. Best, Alex

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s